Skip to comments.
BREAKING: Dinesh D'Souza Pleads Guilty to Violating Campaign Finance Law
Townhall ^
| Tuesday, May 20. 2014
| Katie Pavlich
Posted on 05/20/2014 7:24:11 AM PDT by kristinn
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
To: kristinn
And now on to Dirty Harry?
To: kristinn
At least he didn’t leave a girl to drown in a sinking car.
To: Tau Food
Or own a firearm. What the hell was he thinking??? I can’t think of a single politician who would be worth this type of charge even if the risk was calculably infinitesimal. What a dumbass...
43
posted on
05/20/2014 8:32:16 AM PDT
by
Axenolith
(Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
To: FlingWingFlyer
This is a joke when you consider violating campaign finance laws is the norm for Commie RATS. Hmm, even RATS get convicted on bundling. It is just too simple to prosecute. DSouza violated and basic law which is a spit in the face or regulators they can't ignore.
To: BuckeyeTexan
He’ll probably get a pardon with the next GOP President.
To: kristinn
A man is defined by his enemis. Your values are what you will NOT tolerate.
A conviction under THIS particular Prez is a badge of honor, and that will only become more and more clear as time wears on.
Remember the shock that Joe caused when he screamed out, “You lie..!” in the middle of the first State of the Union. Well, now Joe seems prescient.
THAT is where Dinesh is going —he is SHREWD to do this, both for his financial bottom line and also for his legacy.
The Regime is helping Dinesh to become a conservative Michael Moore, but honest and slim.
46
posted on
05/20/2014 9:34:33 PM PDT
by
gaijin
To: Dilbert San Diego
This is like the Martha Stewart case. He would be unable to convince a jury that he is not guilty even if he is not guilty.
47
posted on
05/20/2014 9:42:32 PM PDT
by
Theodore R.
(It's inevitable: status quo Kentuckians are incapable of saying "No" to McC!)
To: Axenolith
I cant think of a single politician who would be worth this type of charge even if the risk was calculably infinitesimal.
And if you were trying to find such a candidate, Wendy Long would not be at the top of your list of prospects. She had never held or even run for any elective office. Her resume highlight was having served as a legal advisor to Mitt Romney. Most importantly, she had zero chance against a popular Dem incumbent in deep blue New York. Her eventual losing number was 46%. No, she didn't lose with 46% (a respectable 54-46 loss); she lost by 46% (Gillibrand 72, Long 26).
D'Souza knowingly violated the law so that he could pour his money down a rathole. He explained that she was a friend from his college days, but, given his track record, you have to wonder about the nature of the friendship.
To: Eagle Forgotten
GAAAh! She has a face like an old catchers mitt to boot!
49
posted on
05/21/2014 8:36:04 AM PDT
by
Axenolith
(Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
To: Kickass Conservative
I would think he would submit a No Contest Plea.Impossible in federal court without the consent of the prosecutor. Otherwise, your choices are limited to guilty or not guilty.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson