Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dilbert San Diego

Here is an undesputable fact. If Barry Bathhouse has appointed a Federal judge he has told that federal judge to strike down any state constitutional bans on sodomite “marriage”. If the state attorney general is a democrat he has also been told not to enforce any state constitutional ban if it is challenged in court. Only a few State AGs that are democrats have the integrity and decency to fight for the people and uphold their oath of office. 99% cave toObama. That is exactly what happened in California when Prop 8 was appealed to the US Supreme Court. Governor Ahnuld, and Attorney Gen Jerry Brown refused to represent the people. They hung them out to dry and the Supreme Court would not hear the case. So the queer judge that struck down the will of the people got his way and millions and millions of Californians that had voted down homo “marriage” were disenfranchised. Their vote meant noting. Told to move one, one queer judge has more right than they do. Votes mean nothing in the country anymore. The crooked Supreme Court will always side with a judge over the people.
Today the democrat State Attorney General in Oregon said he would not fight for the people over this radical judge. In otherwords democrats could care less what a law says. They do what they feel like doing and to hell with the people or anyone else. They get their marching orders from the fraud in chief, who refuses to obey the laws of the land each and every day, with an assist from his partner in crime Eric Holder.


49 posted on 05/19/2014 1:47:34 PM PDT by NKP_Vet ("It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died;we should thank God that such men lived" ~ Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: NKP_Vet

Well said.

Yes, we’ve seen this tactic, in which states get sued over their definition of marriage, and liberal state officials decide not to defend the law in court.

I am concerned about how liberals have been shoving homosexual marriage down our throats, aside from the fact of homosexual marriage. I am very concerned about the misuse of the courts and ignoring basic legal processes, in their zeal to impose homosexual marriage on America.

If there were such a groundswell for homosexual marriage, state after state would be voting to allow it, rather than state after state having voted to define marriage in the traditional manner.

I seriously wonder how liberals would react if, there were lawsuits over some issue they favored. How would they react if their public officials simply decide not to defend the law. Among other things, they would scream bloody murder about lack of due process.

But for some reason, the cause of homosexual marriage is so special, that liberals have decided that we can’t defend marriage and family law in court.

I notice the liberals aren’t out there trying to change these laws, through the legislative process. Instead, they decided to force it on us through the courts.

I want to be intellectually honest, in that, I wouldn’t be nearly so critical of the liberals on the marriage issue, if they were working through the political process, rather than forcing it down our throats in court rulings.


55 posted on 05/19/2014 2:06:04 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson