Posted on 05/16/2014 4:07:29 PM PDT by Kaslin
Did you catch the story about those conservative Republican male chauvinist pig politicians in Florida who think that it was a waste of time to pass a bill which would make it a crime for a guy to secretly administer an abortion-inducing drug to a spouse or partner he impregnated? How utterly outrageous ... Wait a minute ... It was Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz who said that? C'mon, that's not possible. What? There's audio of her saying that on a Florida public radio station? Get outta here. If that were true, the press would be printing and broadcasting stories on her outrageous statement 24/7 ... wouldn't they?
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
She didn't have time to think this through. Her instinct is to support baby-killing regardless of circumstances.
In this case, her irrational principles were in conflict. The typical moonbat reaction to such a situation is to suppress the conflicting thoughts, or to simply change the subject. Neither option was open to her, and the result was predictable.
If it were just fine for a woman to do it, how could you argue otherwise for a man to do the same thing?
Well, that’s the thing, he’s just exercising the “Choice”.
If she can make that decision, so can he.
Eat it libs, eat ALL of it.
No, they can't. They wouldn't *be* leftists if everything inside the skull worked as it should.
“Is it Senseless and Wrong to Punish Men Who Slip a pillow over the face of a sleeping infant too?”
Well, yeah...for now, anyway.
bump
For her, that would be a very long time.
“Too bad Debbies daddy didnt slip anything into his wifes drink when this vermin was conceived...”
He did - LSD and it obviously busted a whole bunch of chromosomes!
OMGosh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Now if you pappy did this to yo mammy then we wouldnt be hearin from you now would we?
Excerpted from the article -
“The foundation for Wasserman Schultz’s opposition sounds eerily like the excuse President Barack Obama gave as an Illinois state senator when he “voted down a bill to protect live-born survivors of abortion.” He claimed, as National Review described it in 2012, that “by providing legal protection and ‘recognition as a human person’ for a pre-viable infant, the law could be used to threaten Roe v. Wade.”
Here is the “logic” to which Wasserman Schultz has apparently signed on:
Critics argued that the bill would confer personhood on all unborn babies, from the moment of conception, perhaps leading to a ban on abortions and many forms of birth control.
In other words, “We can’t allow anything to happen which could in any conceivable way recognize the a pre-born baby’s humanity, even if it means that fathers or others can get away with killing an unborn child the mother has chosen to carry to term.”
So much for the term “pro-choice.” Thomas Lifson at American Thinker money line: “The mind boggles at this war on women.” Indeed.
As usual, the press is doing its utmost to ensure that a leftist’s outrageous comment doesn’t get noticed by the general public. A Google News search on “Wasserman Schultz abortion” (not in quotes) at 9:45 a.m. ET returned 11 items, none of which are establishment press outlets.”
bump
It also means they think it’s okay for women to be tricked and lied to and pressured to get abortions
This woman is a psychopath.
It was a very late term abortion (16 & 13 years)
Maybe ol' pappy didnt nebbah do nuffin to ol' mammy n liddo Debbie popped out anyways!!
More on the lefts war on women.
Seems logical for a woman that can’t even figure out her last name so she uses both!
She looks a lot like a blond Frank Zappa
Unbelievable. It is assault, plain and simple — against the woman, and against the baby.
she has no moral compass, no intellectual integrity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.