I don’t think the economy is much of an issue anymore in deciding US elections.
Caliph Baraq was re-elected with 8% unemployment (13% real), $4 gas, surging food prices, and trillion dollar deficits forever. Something I thought impossible.
Crony capitalists to provide the $$ and entitlement army to provide the votes.
Not hard to do when you have corpses voting and living people voting more than once.
I can see your point, why would anyone vote for a loser like Barry ...
But Hillary the Retard is making it an issue.
If you know any lib retards who make it an issue, you can remind them that Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, in the midst of a sanity attack no doubt, said that her Retard party “owns the economy.” That’s an admission.
Hillaretard is implying that under her reign, the economy would be good. The Demoretards have had six years, yet have screwed the pooch: The economy sucks.
Under Democrats. Period.
If she wants to open this door, we walk right in.
But not for a Bush or anyone the GOP/Iowa anoints. If our candidate isn’t a conservative, she can say anything she wants and I won’t care.
I’m gone mini-Galt anyway.