Study rejected for publication because it was 'less than helpful' to the climate cause

Study rejected for publication because it was 'less than helpful' to the climate cause
Daily Mail (UK) ^ | May 16th 2014 | Ben Spencer

Posted on 05/16/2014 11:47:16 AM PDT by Mount Athos

click here to read article

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 last

To: Smokin' Joe

The purpose of peer-review is for university professors to channel grant money to researchers they agree with, and away from researchers that they disagree with. That's what Michael Mann and Christopher Jones did in the climate "science" journals. The famous "emailgate" texts document it. (Climate "science" is not science because it does not use the scientific method, but that's a separate issue.)

Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals

41 posted on 05/17/2014 9:30:23 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

The climate hoaxers should be tried in a court for willful deception and theft.

42 posted on 05/19/2014 3:11:09 PM PDT by lormand (Inside every liberal is a dung slinging monkey)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search

News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794