I have been a little ticked at the number of times global warming is mentioned in connection with particular events when there is no association even reasoned.
Now that there is evidence of the OPPOSITE, they CHANGE the words they use to CLIMATE CHANGE.
Professor John Brignell of The City University, London has compiled a list of all the things attributed to global warming, from acne to yellow fever. His list includes contradictory examples such as more and less hurricanes, more and less coral growth, warming and cooling, more and less maple syrup. (Some of the links are not effects, rather actions that people have advocated to halt global warming).
Now a cause can have more than one effect and even opposite effects depending on the conditions, but when a cause is claimed to result in every possible event it cannot true—based on the Law of Non Contradiction.
A theory that explains everything really explains nothing. It is not predictive and it is not falsifiable. If global warming is claimed to cause everything how can it possibly be disproved?
They even tried to blame the cold winter here in Wisconsin on climate change. Imagine...a cold winter in Wisconsin. Why, that’s never happened before. (snicker) There’ a couple of Russky scientists who are predicting climate change, but colder weather. After this last winter (and this cold spring), I think they might be right.
>>Now a cause can have more than one effect and even opposite effects depending on the conditions, but when a cause is claimed to result in every possible event it cannot true—based on the Law of Non Contradiction.
>>A theory that explains everything really explains nothing. It is not predictive and it is not falsifiable. If global warming is claimed to cause everything how can it possibly be disproved?
More proof that Global Warming is a religion. You can use the same arguments to prove the existence of God that they do to prove GW. But, they claim that we can’t use that argument for the reasons you listed.