RE: The House (not all Congress) is now acting as judge. If you further invest it with law enforcement, you may get a precedent for the House to be exercised when the liberals regain control.
Is that what you want for the future?
__________________________
So, let’s look at the title of this thread again -— It says:
Boehner: House Wont Arrest Lois Lerner
That means the house won’t arrest Lerner because THEY CAN’T ( i.e., they are not given the constitutional power to do so )?
Then the title should be changed to: Boehner: House CAN’T Arrest Lois Lerner.
In effect, what we have is a house that can hold someone in contempt but can’t do a damn thing about it unless the executive branch acts.
So, what’s left to do?
I guess impeachment should be the next and only option left.
I'm NOT an expert on this, but it seems that many of the things we suppose about preserving the Constitution are simoly being trashed. Impeachment is overdue, IMHO.
There are some real experts in this forum, and it seems to me they think so.
I also think that if there had been a strong VP it would have taken place long ago. A key strategy to keep BOb seated was to get a dunce elected with him, eh?