Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, Eric Holder, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, Obamacare, Green Energy, Lois Lerner.
That's right, it's much better when the Democrats win. In fact, why even vote, we'd risk electing a RINO.
Centurion puts forth the idiotic argument of assuming that had Romney been in office, his choices wouldn't have been just as odious and the consequences just as evil, actually moreso because a Republican being responsible neuters and weakens any Republican opposition to said evils. His record in Massachusetts indicates that he would be a full-goose leftist in a Republican costume.
In such circumstances today, it's better that the Dems win. But it's BEST if either one, the leftist Republican or the leftist Democrat, wins by a plurality, where the clear majority of Americans are on record as rejecting said president, Dem or Rep. Plurality splits FAVOR limited government conservatism, if Perot is any example. Clinton was openly rejected by 57% of Americans his first term, and was steamrolled by the Republican Revolution.
Clinton was openly rejected by 51 percent of Americans his second term, during which he was impeached. I want to weaken leftist government tyranny, which is why I'll be voting third party in 2016 as I did in 2012, if the GOP fields another leftist, which it will.
And instead of fooling myself that I'm voting "against" anything, I will embrace the truth that I must cast my vote with an eye to what I am voting FOR, and I will be voting FOR a plurality.