Arguments over violent crime rates and integrity of reporting techniques notwithstanding, let's examine if that disparity is truly due to guns. We can do that intuitively by looking at the membership of the NRA, arguably the most heavily-armed civilian population on the planet, and comparing their annual total and rate of "gun homicides" with those of the "gun free" UK.How do our five million compare to their 63 million? How close to "0" are NRA members' tallies, anyway? And how close to "0" are other national gun rights advocacy groups, like JPFO? Is there any doubt that if there were numbers that could be exploited, the media and the anti-gunners would be all over them? And what if it turns out the UK has a rate more than 40 times higher (or more) than peaceable members of U.S. gun groups?
The UK gun related homicide rate is 40 times that of the NRA.
False argument, and I say that as a pro-gun, gun owning Brit.
There are still (contrary to US myth) 2.3m legal weapons in the UK, and there are still hundreds of gun clubs and gun ranges. There are also many UK pro-gun/shooting groups.
Their gun crime/gun murder rate is equal to the NRA’s, if not even less. IE very low, almost nothing.