Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boehner: House won't arrest Lerner
The Hill ^

Posted on 05/11/2014 8:07:02 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Boehner: House won't arrest Lerner

By Russell Berman - 05/11/14 10:53 AM EDT

The House has held Lois Lerner in contempt, but it won’t use its power to place the former IRS official under arrest, Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said on Sunday.

Under a precedent affirmed by the Supreme Court, each chamber of Congress can authorize its sergeant-at-arms to detain individuals it holds in contempt. But Boehner said on "Fox News Sunday" that he has no interest in doing that with Lerner, whom the House last week voted to hold in contempt over her refusal to testify about her role in the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups.

“I’m not sure we want to go down that path,” Boehner said. “It’s never been used,” he said of the provision allowing Congress to arrest individuals and place them in the Capitol jail. The Senate has in fact used that power, but not in the last 80 years. “I’m not sure that it’s an appropriate way to go about this,” Boehner said.

The contempt charge has been referred to the Justice Department, and Boehner said it is up to Attorney General Eric Holder to prosecute Lerner.

“Now will he do it? We don’t know, but the ball is in his court,” Boehner said.

The U.S. attorney’s office in Washington has said it is reviewing the referral. Lerner has repeatedly invoked her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, but the House contends she waived that right by defending herself in an opening statement at a House hearing last year before she refused to answer questions from lawmakers.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: boehner; irsteapartyscandal; lerner; lernercontempt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: cripplecreek
Too often things like this have been allowed to slide down the memory hole

Otherwise know as The Statute of Limitations.

61 posted on 05/11/2014 10:41:50 AM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The ball was in Boehner’s court and he scored — for the other team.


62 posted on 05/11/2014 10:43:53 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
Otherwise know as The Statute of Limitations.

Actually I'm thinking about republicans dropping things after winning control.
63 posted on 05/11/2014 10:45:40 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Dog and phony shows continued.


64 posted on 05/11/2014 10:47:18 AM PDT by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

In other words, this was just a stunt to garner votes from conservatives, who we despise when there is no election going on.


65 posted on 05/11/2014 10:50:05 AM PDT by gitmo (If your theology doesn't become your biography, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Actually I'm thinking about republicans dropping things after winning control.

Many here though that GW would reveal the absolute disrespect that the Clintons showed to The People's House, but instead he made him a brother.

66 posted on 05/11/2014 10:52:00 AM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
Hasn’t Holder already been held in contempt of Congress? It seems to me he’s the one who should be arrested.

Holder was indeed voted to be in contempt of congress almost two years ago and yet he is permitted to continue to appear before congress to testify. The government is completely broken when there are no consequences for criminal behavior by the Attorney General.

67 posted on 05/11/2014 11:04:26 AM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
FedHighwayFail photo fedhwyfail.jpg
68 posted on 05/11/2014 11:28:21 AM PDT by PowderMonkey (WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

You can only use it once?????


69 posted on 05/11/2014 12:32:51 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

Your post needs to go viral, seriously.


70 posted on 05/11/2014 1:11:34 PM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

Lerner is NOT worth using this Silver Bullet!
Neither is she worth giving immunity.


71 posted on 05/11/2014 4:15:43 PM PDT by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

This may not be such a dumb move by the House, now it’s
in Holder’s court. I suspect he will come up with some
reasoning why he can’t or won’t, but then the whole
thing steps up a notch. Can the house go directly to the
Supremes on this? What happens then?


72 posted on 05/11/2014 4:21:11 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

From a DC article on this...

“There’s a provision in the Constitution that has never been used,” Boehner admitted. “And uh, and so — that’s uh — I’m not quite sure that we want to go down that path . . . It’s never been used.”

The Speaker couldn’t explain why the provision has laid dormant — “I’m not the historian here” — but said he’s “not sure that it’s an appropriate way to go about this.”

“It’s up to Eric Holder to do his job,” Boehner asserted.

http://dailycaller.com/2014/05/11/boehner-rules-out-using-congressional-powers-to-arrest-lois-lerner-for-contempt/#ixzz31S9j0aAt

*****

Boehner *asserted*? He sounds like a huge coward. :(


73 posted on 05/11/2014 4:36:57 PM PDT by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs assist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68

The Supremes would say, oh, no, not my baby. And kick it back to the congress.


74 posted on 05/11/2014 4:59:40 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

They can use it as many times as they want...no???????


75 posted on 05/11/2014 5:00:19 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: glennaro
The House Boner fails to rise to the challenge ... again. Why even bother with a contempt vote if you're not going to enforce it?

Because the whole thing was never anything more than a show for the rubes in the cheap seats.

76 posted on 05/11/2014 5:06:34 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (I'm a Christian, pro-life, pro-gun, Reaganite. The GOP hates me. Why should I vote for them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
Many here though that GW would reveal the absolute disrespect that the Clintons showed to The People's House, but instead he made him a brother.

Imagine that.

77 posted on 05/11/2014 5:14:29 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (I'm a Christian, pro-life, pro-gun, Reaganite. The GOP hates me. Why should I vote for them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
The ball was in Boehner’s court and he scored — for the other team.

Good boy, Johnny!


78 posted on 05/11/2014 5:20:54 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (I'm a Christian, pro-life, pro-gun, Reaganite. The GOP hates me. Why should I vote for them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

The Supremes would say, oh, no, not my baby. And kick it back to the congress.

So essentually surrendering to the executive?
They have a choice, side with the Constitution
or Obama. The stakes for all of us, including them
are very high, mortally high.
Restrain dictatorial rule or live under it,
if they call that living...those societies have
a large tendency of eating their own. Choose wisely
Supremes...


79 posted on 05/11/2014 5:31:43 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: tet68

Well, if the congress wants to hold her in contempt, then it’d be up to them to enforce it. I believe they have the power to jail her. Holder for sure won’t. And I doubt the supremes would intercede.


80 posted on 05/11/2014 6:01:45 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson