The only reason that I can think that a bunch of cases like this make it to the Supremes in the first place is this. Attorneys are being indoctrinated with worthless ideas in the law schools as opposed to being taught the Constitution as the Founding States had intended for it to be understood.
More specifically, regarding the issue of housing and illegal aliens, the Founding States made the 10th Amendment to clarify that the constitution's silence about things like immigration means that such issues are automatically unique state power issues.
And taking the Constitution's silence about aliens a step further, that also means that illegal aliens have no enumerated protections.
So there you have it folks. It took me a few minutes of spare time to make this under half page post, and I wonder how many dollars were spent in legal fees to get basically the same conclusion from the Supremes.
BTW, here's my "legal" credentials.
“3. The Constitution was written to be understood by the voters; its words and phrases were used in their normal and ordinary as distinguished from technical meaning; where the intention is clear, there is no room for construction and no excuse for interpolation or addition.” —United States v. Sprague, 1931.
When we went to my son-in-law’s graduation from legal school, where he got a parallel MBA (while supporting my daughter and three children), I noted the number of new attorneys who were lauded for working with/for an area legal aid society that specializes in helping illegals. If that’s not a sign of the degree of corruption of principles (legal and moral) we now live in, I’ not sure what is.