My theory(That I posted last night) but wont go into full detail since it would take too long, is that this was from the start, a Blind Sheikh for Stevens swap that went horribly wrong. I dont believe that anyone was supposed to die that day..Remember all the rumors about the Blind Sheikh being released back to Libya since they wanted him back, that rumor started two weeks before Benghazi happened. The state Department denied it, but it wasn’t an outright denial, more like a half ass denial. When Benghazi happened I knew that is what happened, took me 5 seconds to figure it out. Stevens was supposed to be swapped for the Sheikh, Obama would be declared a hero who saved a US Ambassador’s life, and he would have won in a landslide..they did NOT expect the other three men to arrive, that was NOT in the plan..when they did, they just said screw it and let them all die, I bet they watched
I disagree. The best explanation for why it wasn’t a planned kidnapping was from Anne Barnhardt, and is as follows:
“Next is the whole “kidnapping plot gone wrong” argument. Sorry. It doesn’t hold water. First, the theory that Obama wanted to do a prisoner exchange of Ambassador Stevens for the Blind Sheik right before the election in order to look like some sort of hero is simply ludicrous. Americans would have been repulsed and disgusted by such a move. Americans don’t cotton to capitulation to kidnappers. And releasing the Blind Sheik? No, this would have worked against Obama in public opinion. The fact of one of our Ambassadors being kidnapped at all would have come off as a sign of profound weakness, and releasing the Blind Sheik would have pegged the needle on the ol’ wimp-o-meter.”
“Next, this kidnapping scenario assumes that the Obama regime was relying on fairly contested elections, had no election fraud teams in place in the major metro areas of the swing states, and/or was truly Nixonian in its desire for a unanimous victory. Again, nope. They clearly weren’t going for a unanimous or near-unanimous electoral college sweep as Nixon was trying to do. They were all about targeted fraud in the swing states. They had no care or concern about winning Kansas, Wyoming or Oklahoma. The motives simply don’t match up.”
“Finally, we have to ask why the Clintons were co-conspirators in the murder of Stevens. WHY are the Clintons a.) participating in the initial murder of Stevens and b.) not throwing Obama and Jarrett under the bus? The Obama machine stole the 2008 primaries from Hillary, and both Bill and Hillary personally loathe Obama and his Chicago crew. Why this unholy demonic alliance?”
“Because Chris Stevens was a lynchpin in the running of arms by the Obama regime and Clinton’s State Department in full cooperation with each other to the Muslim Brotherhood and al Qaeda through Libya. And yes, it is absolutely sane and appropriate to assume that Huma Abedin (Hillary’s consigliere and daughter of high-ranking Muslim Brotherhood leaders, and possible lesbian concubine of Hilary) figures into this.”
The Saudi Royal family paid for BHO2’s Harvard Law School. He owed them.