[Mastador1]

Come on don’t be silly, no one in their right mind wants to see innocents killed and tortured the way these people are, so of course if they can be saved they should. But let me ask you this, why does it always have to be American lives put in jeopardy and lost? I seem to recall there are a lot of other countries with military, let them take a bigger role for a change. I don’t see where we need to be involved other than intel.

[Rashputin]

I agree it should be other people and there are more than enough people willing to do it if someone would train them and provide Intel. In the past we even compensated Israel for training people so we'd be "hands off" and there's no reason we should stand by and see this stuff continue since there are people willing to resist it.

For example, there are Christian militias in Syria that Assad arms, equips, and some say even trains. They have their own leaders and pick their own ops in coordination with the regular Syrian military but their primary function is to protect Christian towns from bands of Muzzies. In Syria, though, we provide equipment to Muzzie rebels, some of whom are such butchers even their fellow Mooze Lames fight them.

There could be Christian militias capable of taking on Boko and in other places as well if we weren't kissing Muzzie butt all the time. Militias made up entirely of the people threatened or at least made up of people from the same region. It's a matter of changing policy from kissing up to Mizzies to helping Christians defend themselves, that's all.