For those of us watching who don’t know which candidates are endoresed by the tea party, can you help us out?
Also Ellmers is ahead of Roche in 2nd CD, but only getting 56% has got to hurt. Clay Aiken looks to be Ellmers’ opponent in November.
NAME ON BALLOT | PARTY | BALLOT COUNT | PERCENT |
---|---|---|---|
Thom Tillis | REP | 63,778 | 45.96 % |
Greg Brannon | REP | 39,093 | 28.17 % |
Mark Harris | REP | 22,236 | 16.02 % |
Heather Grant | REP | 6,991 | 5.04 % |
Jim Snyder | REP | 2,580 | 1.86 % |
Ted Alexander | REP | 2,553 | 1.84 % |
Alex Lee Bradshaw | REP | 960 | 0.69 % |
Edward Kryn | REP | 578 | 0.42 % |
NAME ON BALLOT | PARTY | BALLOT COUNT | PERCENT |
---|---|---|---|
Kay Hagan | DEM | 118,415 | 81.62 % |
Will Stewart | DEM | 15,894 | 10.95 % |
Ernest T. Reeves | DEM | 10,777 | 7.43 % |
NAME ON BALLOT | PARTY | BALLOT COUNT | PERCENT |
---|---|---|---|
Sean Haugh | LIB | 359 | 61.16 % |
Tim D'Annunzio | LIB | 228 | 38.84 % |
I’m in NC and can’t seem to determine which precincts have reported, and which have not. A 6% swing with 58% of precincts reporting is not impossible, but it’s doubtful if urban and eastern precincts are yet to report. Anti-establishment sentiment is typically more of a Piedmont and Western thing, and more rural and outer suburban than urban. Suburbs are a tossup and hinge upon relative prosperity or being stressed economically.
Tillis needs 40% to avoid a runoff, right?
That’s weird. When I posted it was 55% reporting. Now it is 25%.
Who do we want to win?
interesting ... report of false election returns (statewide NC) ... http://www.wbtv.com/story/25447556/false-election-returns-show-up-due-to-error-with-new-statewide-system
It has been called for Tillis.
I hope Hagan wins.
F the GOP
Whenever I start feeling like people are waking up, I get proven wrong.
Stay asleep sheeple, your masters are counting on it.
(FReepers are excluded)