If you had a business partner who went crazy and started ranting about how sharia law should be imposed on the U.S., you might not try top force him out of the partnership?
“If you had a business partner who went crazy and started ranting about how sharia law should be imposed on the U.S., you might not try top force him out of the partnership?”
There might have been a clause in the partnership where “forcing” wouldn’t be necessary. I’d say that endangering/sabotaging the very survival of the business would probably be one of those clauses.
Buttin’ in — I wouldn’t be in business with a muzzie business partner in the first place, but in your hypothetical scenario (perhaps an ad hoc conversion to Islam), my partner would die young of natural causes.
(A) Mr. Sterling was taped without his knowledge, which is, I believe, a felony in California (B) it was almost certainly done at the behest of Magic Johnson, who has been rebuffed in the past by Mr. Sterling in his attempts to buy the team so he almost certainly hatched a plot with the mistress to catch Sterling in a racist rant. Tell me, would you feel fine if EVERYTHING you’ve said in private in the past was broadcast to the world?
That’s why partnership agreements have a shotgun clause.
If an owner tries to buy out Sterling for $100 million, Sterling should have the right to keep his team and buy out the other guy for $100 million