How can someone continue telling lies when its so incredibly obvious.
This has to be how the ‘party’ in communist Russia acted.
They keep it up in a belief that the continuous prattle will numb, then change minds.
And history would show them to be successful in many cases.
Bad consequences follow, of course.
No matter how threadbare the lies hav become, they keep telling them because they have no other choice. All they can do at this point is stay focused on repeating them and hoping that the MSM will keep the heat off long enough for something else to enter the news cycle and push the issue off the national radar again.
They might even succeed. It’s worked so far.
From both Clintons to Gore to Barry and Reid: obfuscation, delay, insolence, abuse the plaintiff, feigned outrage, lies on top of lies—it’s what Democrats do.
Always remember .. the left proceeds with every idea on the basis of the right is too stupid to know the difference.
I think most of them are shell-shocked that the American people are not falling into line.
A key word is “complicated”. If they tell you it’s too complicated to explain .. that’s because they don’t want you to know the truth.
This has to be how the ‘party’ in communist Russia acted.
The guiding political philosophy behind Communism is Dialetical Materialism.
Rule 1 of Dialectical Materialism is that everything the elite leadership says is the truth and cannot be denied.
Rule 2 is "See Rule 1".
A conflict between leadership dogma and the truth can be resolved in two ways. Either the truth is manipulated or the past is changed.
Rule 2 is why Soviet leaders kept being airbrushed out of photographs...
Enough White House lies on Benghazi
By: David Limbaugh
5/2/2014 06:00 AM
The Obama administration has no shred of integrity left concerning the Benghazi scandal. Caught in the act with the “loaded gun,” those in the administration are telling us it is a toy pistol, but no honest observer can possibly believe them anymore.
It took a lawsuit to force the White House to release emails that reveal just how deliberate and fraudulent the plan was to deceive the press and the American public about the cause of the attack on our consulate in Libya.
The incident and a nearby attack a few hours later, in which four Americans were killed, occurred in September 2012, just a few short months before the November presidential election. Obama’s foreign policy credibility was on the line, for he had long boasted that he had al-Qaida on the run, despite his efforts to relax our war on terror into a law enforcement matter (except for his precious drones, of course).
Reports emerged that there had been previous attempted attacks on the consulate and that our people there had asked for heightened security, which the administration callously rejected. Was this sheer indifference or a result of Obama’s concern that enhancing security would signal a failure in his magical policy of appeasing terrorists? Either way, it was disgraceful.
It was obvious at the time but is now undeniable that with cold premeditation, the administration hatched a sinister ploy to blame the attacks on an anti-Islam video that had surfaced on the Internet. There was no evidence that this video had incited the Benghazi attacks or that the attacks were spontaneous but much evidence that they were preplanned by al-Qaida terrorists. But the entire White House spin machine immediately went into overdrive constructing and disseminating this false narrative, even to the point of having federal authorities arrest the hapless creator of the video, whom they nabbed on other charges. This was a horrifying abuse of government power starting at the very top, and it is not the America any of us should love.
Finally, after a year of withholding internal emails, the White House, under legal compulsion, turned them over to Judicial Watch. Included was an email from Ben Rhodes, an assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser for strategic communications, dated Sept. 14, 2012. Its subject heading was “RE: PREP CALL with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 pm ET,” and the email was sent to about a dozen members of Obama’s inner circle, including press secretary Jay Carney.
The thrust of the message was clear: Protect Obama’s image (and re-election efforts) at all costs; American interests and the American public’s right to know be damned. It contained four bullet points:
The rest of the scandal
http://www.humanevents.com/2014/05/02/enough-white-house-lies-on-benghazi/