Skip to comments.
Lindsey Graham may be cruising to victory
Hotair ^
| 05/04/2014
| Jazz Shaw
Posted on 05/04/2014 5:00:57 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
To: SeekAndFind
2
posted on
05/04/2014 5:04:13 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
To: SeekAndFind
3
posted on
05/04/2014 5:09:22 PM PDT
by
Nifster
To: SeekAndFind
People of South Carolina!
Have you no shame?
4
posted on
05/04/2014 5:11:56 PM PDT
by
x1stcav
("The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there.")
To: SeekAndFind
What does it *take* to defeat these traitorous scumbags?
Remember when he was known as “Lindsay Gramnesty?”
5
posted on
05/04/2014 5:11:58 PM PDT
by
dsc
(Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
To: SeekAndFind
Massachusetts,Vermont,New York,California and others cannot do better than Lindsey Graham.South Carolina,OTOH,most assuredly can.
6
posted on
05/04/2014 5:12:20 PM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
(Stalin Blamed The Kulaks,Obama Blames The Tea Party)
To: SeekAndFind
Really, South Carolina, is that the BEST that you can do?
7
posted on
05/04/2014 5:20:40 PM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(Operating out of weakness? Imagine if he was working from a position of strength!)
To: dsc
Hey, plenty buy into the lesser evil crap. They feel winning is the most important thing. So Lindsay will win and they get exactly what they wanted. Amnesty, gay everything and a war with Russia. But as long as ‘We win” that’s all that matters right? “What” we win is a different story entirely. But we ‘win’.
Remember that folks when you hear your BFFreeper spouting the liberal meme of lesser evil and the rest.
8
posted on
05/04/2014 5:37:03 PM PDT
by
Norm Lenhart
(How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
To: x1stcav
People of South Carolina! Have you no shame?
Not a lick, Colorado! Smoke another one.
BTW, when ya'll come down, maybe you would like to know that the Primary is June 10th (WE HAVEN'T VOTED YET!!!) and the expected/hoped-for runoff is 3 weeks later.
Also, Colorado, it has been SIX years since we could vote to replace Senator Graham.
Now, back to your regularly-scheduled lambaste of South Carolina Constitutional conservatives...
To: SeekAndFind
10
posted on
05/04/2014 5:41:02 PM PDT
by
Engraved-on-His-hands
(Conservative 2016!! The Dole, H.W. Bush, McCain, Romney experiment has failed.)
To: NonValueAdded
Really, South Carolina, is that the BEST that you can do?
Florida, you self-righteousness is looking quite hypocritical to us. You have work to do in Florida first. A lot of work. But thank you for throwing your trash on our highways when passing through; gives road gangs work.
To: x1stcav
It’s simple math. The anti-Graham forces should have found and funded ONE good candidate. At that they failed, and he skates right in. Time for conservatives to get their act together if they’re going to do more than loathe RINOs.
12
posted on
05/04/2014 5:44:56 PM PDT
by
EDINVA
To: Resettozero
I’ll answer for Nellie and Marco when the time comes but this is your year, SC.
13
posted on
05/04/2014 5:45:51 PM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(Operating out of weakness? Imagine if he was working from a position of strength!)
To: SeekAndFind
This is what happens when six competitors go up against one liberal. The liberal will win.
To: EDINVA; upchuck
Its simple math. The anti-Graham forces should have found and funded ONE good candidate. At that they failed, and he skates right in. Time for conservatives to get their act together if theyre going to do more than loathe RINOs.
Ed, it may be simple Common Core Standards math but doesn't really add up the way you think. Upchuck has explained our 50% + 1 vote primary system at least 10 times that I've seen on FR; probably many more than that. The more anti-Graham CHALLENGERS, the better the chance to hold him under 50%.
No skating in for LG, Virginia dummkoph.
To: NonValueAdded
Ill answer for Nellie and Marco when the time comes but this is your year, SC.
Poppycock; you've got a lot of corrections to make in Florida NOW before giving S.C. advice. Plain insulting, you are.
To: SoFloFreeper
This is what happens when six competitors go up against one liberal. The liberal will win.
S.C. primary rules (50% +1 vote) has been explained to you PERSONALLY. On this subject, you are posting garbage again.
To: EDINVA
I’ll take your word for it.
But South Carolinian’s should still hang their heads in shame.
18
posted on
05/04/2014 6:03:17 PM PDT
by
x1stcav
("The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there.")
To: EDINVA
Graham is just enough of a weasel to line up additional “conservative” candidates and reward them well...
19
posted on
05/04/2014 6:05:25 PM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
(Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
To: SeekAndFind
THIS does not bode well for conservatives.
Obama elected twice. Graham seemingly coasting to reelection... What in the world am in not seeing?
How do we turn the electorate back to sanity? Or is it that conservatives are overwhelmingly outnumbered to the point of ineffectiveness, not only as a national demographic, but even within the GOP?
The entire state of SC can’t be moonbat insane, so it must be me. I’m at a complete loss to comprehend the SC voters mindset if they reelect that waste of a human being.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson