Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgan in Denver
Conversely you could also argue that the Anti-Federalists’ (AF) argument was closer to reality in the long run. I have read AF’s extensively, and I think had I lived then I would have supported them.

The Union should have been one of 13 sovereign states, without giving so much power to the behemoth the federal government has no become.

In reality, though, much of what it HAS become is plainly unconstitutional, yet the highest court in the land will not declare it that, as they are as political as the other two branches, and in the long their highest calling is their own existence, rather than that document I took an oath to.

130 posted on 05/04/2014 8:46:08 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: Alas Babylon!

You and I could kill a few evenings and bottles of scotch over this one.

IMHO, the Civil War resolved the intent of state separation and the Tenth Amendment. The war put the fed directly into state government and allowed the fed to dictate to states. As much as slavery was the reason behind the Civil War, the issue of states rights fit into it as well. Up until then states believed they were autonomous and independent. Not so, in the end.


142 posted on 05/04/2014 9:37:06 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver (Democrats: The party of unintended consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson