To: SoConPubbie
The point is that it wasn’t the grassroots that elected Reagan per Cruz’s current rhetoric, but it was in fact an anti-incumbent vote among swing voters in 1980 that removed Carter from office.
To: research99
The point is that it wasnt the grassroots that elected Reagan per Cruzs current rhetoric, but it was in fact an anti-incumbent vote among swing voters in 1980 that removed Carter from office.
All speculation on your point with no support in facts on the ground.
I was there, and everyone I know, conservatives and people who would be considered traditional social conservatives and those who understood what the constitution was all about were as excited as hell to be able to vote for Ronald Reagan.
My experience tells me it was a grassroots tsunami that swept Ronald Reagan into office, your theory not withstanding.
32 posted on
05/04/2014 12:50:35 AM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: research99
The grassroots groups energized Reagan's election. The rejection of Carter's weakness and incompetence with the Iran crisis and the poor economy was far more important than any "anti-incumbent" movement.
The American people knew Carter was wrong, and threw him out in spite of the media's insistence that Reagan was an "extremist". The more people heard from Reagan themselves, the more they liked him. The more they saw of Carter, the more they disliked him.
33 posted on
05/04/2014 12:57:37 AM PDT by
Lakeshark
(Mr Reid, tear down this law!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson