Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoConPubbie

The point is that it wasn’t the grassroots that elected Reagan per Cruz’s current rhetoric, but it was in fact an anti-incumbent vote among swing voters in 1980 that removed Carter from office.


31 posted on 05/03/2014 5:01:22 PM PDT by research99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: research99
The point is that it wasn’t the grassroots that elected Reagan per Cruz’s current rhetoric, but it was in fact an anti-incumbent vote among swing voters in 1980 that removed Carter from office.

All speculation on your point with no support in facts on the ground.

I was there, and everyone I know, conservatives and people who would be considered traditional social conservatives and those who understood what the constitution was all about were as excited as hell to be able to vote for Ronald Reagan.

My experience tells me it was a grassroots tsunami that swept Ronald Reagan into office, your theory not withstanding.
32 posted on 05/04/2014 12:50:35 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: research99
The grassroots groups energized Reagan's election. The rejection of Carter's weakness and incompetence with the Iran crisis and the poor economy was far more important than any "anti-incumbent" movement.

The American people knew Carter was wrong, and threw him out in spite of the media's insistence that Reagan was an "extremist". The more people heard from Reagan themselves, the more they liked him. The more they saw of Carter, the more they disliked him.

33 posted on 05/04/2014 12:57:37 AM PDT by Lakeshark (Mr Reid, tear down this law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson