Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

“These soldiers were told, however, that they could have tattoos and that it wouldn’t affect them.”

And they won’t - at their current rank. But at least when I was in, tattoos were very strongly discouraged amongst officers, and anyone getting a lot of them would know it could limit how high one went.

Heck, the first time I was passed over for major, the SQ/CC said it was because my official photo had a wrinkle in the sleeve, and that would indicate sloppiness to a promotion board!


47 posted on 05/02/2014 9:12:11 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (I sooooo miss America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers

If they hadn’t changed the rules, Mr Rogers, I’d have no problem with it. However, you can’t give someone permission to do something and then punish them for doing it.

Since it requires mutilation to remove these, it is not like approving of beards and then disapproving of beards.

The clear answer is to grandfather those who received tatoos during the time when it was permissible and deny them to all new recruits.


49 posted on 05/02/2014 9:14:38 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson