I have a question: If people think Dr. Kevorkian kills people in a noble way, then they can’t say that’s unacceptable for the death penalty?
“I have a question: If people think Dr. Kevorkian kills people in a noble way, then they can’t say that’s unacceptable for the death penalty?”
It’s a good point but the opposition will say it is against the person’s will.
“If people think Dr. Kevorkian kills people in a noble way, then they can’t say that’s unacceptable for the death penalty?”
Sort of like the militant anti-smokers working on passing legalization of marijuana.