Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoConPubbie

Scalia is not endorsing suppression of speech here; he is saying that suppression of free speech works to the advantage of socialists.


25 posted on 05/01/2014 6:11:56 AM PDT by Theodore R. (It was inevitable: Texans will always be for Cornball and George P.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Theodore R.

You’re correct. Which is why Scalia opposes the finance limits, because he knows that they favour the incumbents. Imagine a war where you have to attack an entrenched enemy and being told that you have to limit yourself to the same number of troops as the enemy. When you are attacking an established opponent you need even more resources to overcome the natural advantages of incumbency.


26 posted on 05/01/2014 6:22:31 AM PDT by littleharbour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.; NY.SS-Bar9; Heart of Georgia
Scalia is not endorsing suppression of speech here; he is saying that suppression of free speech works to the advantage of socialists.

My bad.

I shouldn't try to comprehend/analyze things at 2:00 AM in the morning. :)
28 posted on 05/01/2014 7:05:54 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson