To: SoConPubbie
Scalia is not endorsing suppression of speech here; he is saying that suppression of free speech works to the advantage of socialists.
25 posted on
05/01/2014 6:11:56 AM PDT by
Theodore R.
(It was inevitable: Texans will always be for Cornball and George P.!)
To: Theodore R.
You’re correct. Which is why Scalia opposes the finance limits, because he knows that they favour the incumbents. Imagine a war where you have to attack an entrenched enemy and being told that you have to limit yourself to the same number of troops as the enemy. When you are attacking an established opponent you need even more resources to overcome the natural advantages of incumbency.
To: Theodore R.; NY.SS-Bar9; Heart of Georgia
Scalia is not endorsing suppression of speech here; he is saying that suppression of free speech works to the advantage of socialists.
My bad.
I shouldn't try to comprehend/analyze things at 2:00 AM in the morning. :)
28 posted on
05/01/2014 7:05:54 AM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson