Is it right to treat someone immorally if he is immoral? It certainly is far easier to rationalize why Sterling should be punished for his private opinions surreptitiously obtained. Aside from his words, what did he do wrong? Shouldn't actions be the metric and not an opinion expressed in private?
Well said.
The criteria are whatever the liberals decide the criteria are, at any given time.
As we saw in this rush to judgement, what was said privately vs. his public actions were of no consequence to the liberals.
Well, yeah....you would think so...