Replies

Well then Buttercup, as I told another chest thumping hyperpatriot banging the war drums last week, you have a duty as an American to contact Fedgov and turn me and all those like me in as the foreign agents you believe us to be.

LOL what? Norma, you're nuts.

You start with stupid name calling, then you throw in a straw man fallacy and then you finnish with some paranoid comment that I should call the Feds on you. And that's in your first paragraph.

Now all the above is easily researched and provable/proven. As such, take your ‘appeasement’ talking point and shove it firmly yet lovingly, with special attention to social justice, homosexual rights for the military and perhaps a slice of lime for added ‘zing’.

So you got all emotional over the word "appeasement". What you are describing is appeasement. Doesn't mean that appeasement isn't the right course to take when a country as no choice for instances, because their CIC is a traitor.

For example the US has every right to send Ukraine food rations. If the US can't send food rations because they are afraid that they will start a war, that's called appeasement. Maybe it's the right decision and maybe it isn't. But it's still appeasement.

Here's a question: What does one call a thread on FreeRepublic that doesn't have Norma Lenhart flying off the handle.

Answer, an unusual event.