You object to even sending food rations to Ukraine?
Look at some point one needs to draw a line between appeasement and a reasonable response. Where do you draw it?
Whether it be boots on the ground or sending arms or sending food rations or not doing anything for Ukraine, one needs to draw a reasonable line.
Whether it be helping Ukraine or all NATO countries or some NATO countries or not helping any country, one needs to make a reasonable response and a response that is not appeasement.
Where do you draw it??
A reasonable response by whose standard? We can be world cop or not. Binary. One or the other. We are a Republic or an Empire. Again, Binary.
At what point does America get out of the worlds business and tend to OUR affairs? A reasonable response to during a time of .1% (that’s point one) growth, a time when we are split 8 ways to Wednesday on everything, A time where every man woman child and government funded transvestite is over 100,000 bucks in the hole at birth thanks to sending the Ukraines of the world food and cash, a time when our borders are being overrun with govt assistance, a time when there are more scandals than any of us can name off the top of our heads...is to let other countries handle their own affairs.
If you find the above unreasonable or PROVABLY untrue in any way whatsoever, please detail your reasoning. Ukraine is not a territory or protectorate of America. It is as far away from America as one can get and still be in this hemisphere. There are plenty of NATO countries between us and them. Let them deal with it.