[PapaBear3625]

But in this case I say "send her back".

Since she was previously found "not guilty", extraditing her would subject her to double jeopardy, which is why I think US judges will likely say no.

[Gay State Conservative]

Since she was previously found "not guilty", extraditing her would subject her to double jeopardy, which is why I think US judges will likely say no.

I don't know about you but I've done a certain amount of traveling in my day.Countries as civilized as Canada,Britain,Germany,Australia and Japan among others.I've also visited countries as *un* civilized as Vietnam (as a tourist,not a soldier),Indonesia,Tanzania and China..among others.When entering each of those countries (civilized or not) I knew that I was subject to *their* police,*their* courts,*their* judges,*their* laws...for better or for worse.The same is true for foreigners coming here.Do you think that Canadians or Mexicans who commit wanton murders in Texas should be exempt from the death penalty simply because *their* home countries don't have the DP and oppose other countries having it? No,I didn't think so.Neither do I.

[CityCenter]

Plus, she is innocent.

[Yaelle]

Since she was previously found “not guilty”, extraditing her would subject her to double jeopardy, which is why I think US judges will likely say no.

---

I agree. She has been found guilty, then not guilty. Now guilty again? We won’t extradite.

However, I’m unsure of her innocence. Her behavior after the murder and her testimony make her look very suspicious.