It should be easy enough to ascertain whether he shot through the windshield or not... yes?
Still, why is it necessary to whip out your pistol and shoot a 19 year old in the face unless you yourself or someone else is about to die.
“It should be easy enough to ascertain whether he shot through the windshield or not... yes?”
The photo shows four holes in the windshield.
There are 4 holes in the windshield at just about head level.
“It should be easy enough to ascertain whether he shot through the windshield or not... yes?”
*******************************************************************
Yes, he did fire the four shots through the windshild...BUT (and this is a big but” the forensics people need to determine the “angle” he shot the girl from. It appears to me (based upon limited information) that he shot from high up down angle somewhat at the girl as if HE HAD jumped onto the hood as one of the passengers apparently said.
In any case WTF is giving with the judgement (or actually lack thereof) of this latest batch of police/troopers. There was actually no need for him to kill this girl—unless he simply wanted to for the hell of it. HE DOES NOT HAVE EITHER THE TEMPERAMENT OR JUDGEMENT TO BE A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER.
In the picture with the car on the flatbed you can see a tight cluster of 4 projectiles........headshots.
The main issue is this: was she coming at him with the car or not? It seems like she wasn’t, and he killed her just because he was mad she was getting away.