Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gay State Conservative

First I’ve heard also. Having a big delivery system isn’t the same as having a payload worth delivering.

Wasn’t it just a few months ago that SA was threatening to acquire nukes if nothing was done to stop Iran’s program?


17 posted on 04/29/2014 2:02:28 PM PDT by tahoeblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: tahoeblue
First I’ve heard also. Having a big delivery system isn’t the same as having a payload worth delivering.
Wasn’t it just a few months ago that SA was threatening to acquire nukes if nothing was done to stop Iran’s program?

The Saudi's may not physically possess any nukes for those missiles, but it's a commonly known "non-secret" that they have a number on lay-away at Pakistan's Nuke-mart.

20 posted on 04/29/2014 2:27:58 PM PDT by Sparticus (Tar and feathers for the next dumb@ss Republican that uses the word bipartisanship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: tahoeblue

“First I’ve heard also. Having a big delivery system isn’t the same as having a payload worth delivering.”

Supposedly, they have some bought and paid for from the Pak’s and they are boxed-up in Pakistan and ready to go on a plane at a moment’s notice. I think at least some of the Pak stuff is “maintenance free”.


23 posted on 04/29/2014 3:04:20 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson