[IMR 4350]

The “video protest” story was started before the Emails.

In reality the attack was planned then the protest over the video was planned to create the “spontaneous” lie as a cover story.

You can’t plan an attack against a particular person on a particular day at a particular location without someone guaranteeing that particular person will be at the particular location on the particular day.

The only 2 people that could guarantee Stevens would be there on 9/11 was Hillary and Obama, thus the need for the cover story.

By repeating over and over again the attack was a “spontaneous” response to the video protest, people would then respond “there is no connection”.

Repeat “there is no connection” over and over again and people repeating it and hearing it repeated will actually begin to believe it.

Once the connection is made that the video protest was planned in advance and orchestrated as an excuse for the attack, Hillary and Obama are toast.

[TigersEye]

The Cairo U.S. Embassy was tweeting apologies for the video early in the morning of Sep. 11th hours before the attack in Benghazi started. In fact they began tweeting apologies before the protests in Cairo had begun.

[txhurl]

Once the connection is made that the video protest was planned in advance and orchestrated as an excuse for the attack, Hillary and Obama are toast.

---

You think the RATS sent that Turkish Ambassador to engage Stevens that day? Maybe Stevens had plans to be somewhere else but zero & thighness changed them for him?

[Mygirlsmom]

Listen to this podcast. This guy was in Egypt working with the Coptic Christian Churches. His group heard wind IN AUGUST of an impending attack on 9/11, and when they reported to the embassy in Cairo what they knew, they were told that "the WH is aware and they have it under control"

Link here.