[Starboard]

Per the article, the image of the possible wreckage is about 100 miles south of Bangladesh. That’s not the far offshore. I don’t know anything about the prevailing sea currents in that area but its curious that evidently nobody (e.g., fishermen or cargo ships) ever reported seeing any debris in that area nor did anything wash up on local shores. At least there were no such reports that I’m aware of.

[Capt. Tom]

but its curious that evidently nobody (e.g., fishermen or cargo ships) ever reported seeing any debris in that area nor did anything wash up on local shores. At least there were no such reports that I’m aware of.

That's to me,the mystery.
An intact landing in the ocean and no bodies, oil , or debris from the plane discovred anywhere on the planet?? -Tom

[EdLake]

The biggest problem I have with the report from Georesonance is that they say nothing about seeing the signals in later surveys.

They detected the signals from the metals on March 10 and then they checked March 5 and there were no such signals. So, because MH370 disappeared on the 8th, they think the metal signature could be MH370.

Maybe. But, were there also metal signals on March 15 or this morning? I'm not going to get excited over a signal detected only ONCE that might just have been a plane flying in that spot.

Ed