Are you suggesting these issues for the ‘next Bundy’ or a different Bundy transaction, or are you suggesting an exception to res judicata/collateral estoppel regarding the previous final judgments against Bundy?
LOL. I'm a Chaplain, Scout. Translation required! I am neither a lawyer nor the son of a lawyer.
I'm actually suggesting that Natelson's conclusion that it's high time the Fed divested itself of land that long since should have been disposed of.
Now, that might affect Bundy, depending on Nevada and those other western states pressing their claims against the Fed.
It would help future Bundies (How do you spell the plural of Bundy...:>)
If the legal speech you posted means, "should they give Bundy a break on this?", then I'd say, "Yes, they need to start all over again."