Liberals Push for Adult-Child Sex

Eagle Rising ^ | 28 April 2014 | Matt Barber

[robowombat]

Think about the relevance of the lifestyle discussed to the approval of open homosexuality in the armed forces. Predatory sodomites with a deep seated vendetta against normal straight Americans able to grow their culture of depravity within the ranks of the military. Think how much they would like to use their weapons on most of us here at FR.

[null and void]

That was ...unexpected... not.

[ansel12]

You think our military is a bunch of homosexuals who want to kill us?

[MeshugeMikey]

"Several of my friends – gay and straight, male and female – had sex with adults from the ages of nine to 13. Nonefeel they were abused. "

they were driven over the edge....evidently!!

Just because his pals were victimized and didn't respond sanely...means that such behavior is "normal"???

God sees and waits!

[Bailee]

Sounds like Obammy is doing his part to bring back Sodom and Gomorrah

[Red Badger]

“O, brave new world that has such people in't!” ― William Shakespeare, The Tempest

[ansel12]

t doesn’t help when the NAMBLA spokesman describes himself as a Libertarian in an interview with Spy magazine.

This 2008 Time article may explain more on that.

“”The fracas started with Mary J. Ruwart, the candidate with perhaps the deepest, purest libertarian roots (her rejection of government is so complete that some party moderates have begun warning of the anarchical dangers of “Ruwarchy”). In April, a rival called her out for her thoughts in a 1999 book called Short Answers to the Tough Questions. “Children who willingly participate in sexual acts have the right to make that decision as well, even if it’s distasteful to us personally,” Ruwart wrote. “When we outlaw child pornography, the prices paid for child performers rise, increasing the incentives for parents to use children against their will.”

Ruwart’s is a classic libertarian take — a defense of free will (even for “child performers”) and an attack on government prohibitions of any kind.

The party’s executive director, Shane Cory, saw the danger as well, and rushed out a press release titled, “Libertarians call for increased communication to combat child pornography.” Cory was attacked by hardliners who saw the release as an endorsement of increased federal prosecuting power. The party refused to vote on a resolution asking states to strongly enforce existing child porn laws. Cory resigned in protest, depriving a party in the midst of what may be its most promising election season of one of its most able organizers and fund raisers. But for many libertarian faithful, adherence to the most rigid of principles always trumps practical considerations about how those principles might be more broadly observed.

That rigidity has long been libertarianism’s greatest asset.””

[robowombat]

I am pretty certain that the armed forces are going to be subjected to the ‘queering’ process. Aggressive openly queer men can now behave in the way queers behave without fear of sanctions. Queers are by no means effeminate pansies and they are not restricted to the white collar class. What they do have is a deep seated anger towards the rest of us because they know they are never going to be thought of us as ‘normal’ by heterosexual men. They have a vendetta mentality towards majority straight middle class America. They will become a ‘protected class’ in the armed forces and much of the most obnoxious forms of their behavior will just be ignored. Straight men will be routinely insulted and propositioned and the command structure will pretty much look the other way. Anyone offering violence against even sexual assaults will find they will be separated from the service, at the least. In time the queer lifestyle will become incorporated in a lot of the armed forces and the straight, white, Bible reading conservative military man who once was pretty common in the military will find ‘there is no place for someone like you here’. The bent ones will become the normal ones and be just one more segment along with the feminazis, professional blackamoors and mexamericans who can twist the armed forces into not the nation's armed forces but the government's agency of violence.

[ansel12]

The military won’t be using their weapons against FR, anytime soon, in the name of homosexuality.

[cincinnati65]

Homosexuals.......are........sociopaths.......period.

[MrEdd]

Do you honestly believe that the left is working to staff the military with homosexuals for some other reason?

Why did you think it has been such a top priority for the left?

Did you think that they just want to film gay porn in the barracks?
Long term, it will become just that.

[BenLurkin]

[sportutegrl]

This is why gay marriage is the hill I will die on. If the lgbt crowd wins the marriage battle, don’t think for a second they will stop there. Where will they go next? Forced public approval of Polygamy? Beastiality? Pederasty? It’s a war and we can’t lose any more ground.

[ScottinVA]

Those who rape children deserve to be killed. They are forever going to be predators... there’s no evidence that shows they can be “rehabilitated.”

[BenLurkin]

“Orgy-Porgy!” - Aldous Huxley, Brave New Wolrd

[ansel12]

For one thing, they are aren’t “staff-ing” the military with homosexuals, and no, the military is not going to be executing us any time soon, because we don’t support homosexuality.

[robowombat]

The military won’t be using their weapons against FR, anytime soon, in the name of homosexuality.

It won't be in the name of homosexuality. It will be when there is any real grass roots revolt against a government that decides it can now really disregard the Constitution by say refusing to abide by a narrow presidential election the went the ‘wrong’ way, or redefine the 2nd Amendment to say the opposite of what it says and beginning confiscation cordon and sweep operations or any of a host of things that will bring the armed forces into middle America as an occupation force Even if resistance by Constitutionalists is basically civil disobedience the government will call us terrorists and use whatever force they can muster to smash any resistance movement. Making sure the armed forces will mostly ‘just follow orders’ is a big part of that game plan.

[Beagle8U]

“t doesn’t help when the NAMBLA spokesman describes himself as a Libertarian in an interview with Spy magazine.”

Lots of queer libtardians, perhaps a majority.

[ansel12]

Why would you hijack your own thread?

What is your political point with all of this wild raving?

[ansel12]

That’s what these guys should be raving about, politics, and the politics that are taking place within the GOP as the libertarians fight for the gay agenda, from within the republican party.