Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625

True, in which case there’ll be F-35 losses.

But what happens when the F-35s are flying with F-22s as escort or providing general area top cover? With E-3s monitoring and controlling the engagement?

The F-117 and B-2 have, IMHO, created a misperception that the role of stealth attack aircraft is to operate alone on high risk deep penetration missions against high value targets. That’s NOT what the F-35 is designed to do. It’s designed to act as a light strike fighter bomber (more A-7 than F/A-18) in a tightly integrated combat environment.

The “traditional” lone wolfish stealth attack missions will be left to B-2s and stealthy UCAVs. Like the two different types that have recently been photographed in flight over the Midwestern and Southeastern US.


22 posted on 04/28/2014 7:28:15 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: tanknetter

Two engines are still better than one. The F35 should have been a replacement for the Harriers we have. Does not make much sense to go partial stealth with such a small payload. The strike version of the F22 can carry more ordinance plus carry more air to air.


28 posted on 04/28/2014 6:00:25 PM PDT by USAF80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson