“Stevens said the original intention of the founders was not to grant a general right to bear arms to all citizens”
An absolute moron that I can’t believe served on the Supreme Court.
Are we in Alice in Wonderland territory here?
Stevens thinks we need to change the 2nd amendment to bring it in line with the intentions of the Founding Fathers?
The Founding Fathers wrote the constitution, and wrote it in a way to convey their intent. How does it make sense to say we have to change the wording of it, to bring it in line with their intent???
Does anyone else see the flaw in the reasoning??? They wrote it to reflect their intentions.