Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: W.
"---that will not accept/deliver to P.O. boxes as they require residential addresses. Why do we not do the same for absentee ballots?"

I agree but I used to live in a rural area that did not have house numbering systems on the county roads. Would Rural Route 2 Box 181 be much different than a PO Box number as a means to creating frauddulent votes?

16 posted on 04/27/2014 4:23:53 PM PDT by buckalfa (Tilting at Windmills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: buckalfa

I would think RR delivery people would notice high volume of ballots going to one address but realized it happens in the big cities, unabated. However, country folk also have more than a modicum of common sense. If a pile of mail goes to one address, chances are the carrier isn’t going to inspect the address on each piece of mail he/she jams in the box, we get a lot of mail to people here who are long-gone. Ow, my head. ;)


37 posted on 04/28/2014 4:53:04 AM PDT by W. (Obama's "presidency" has been nothing but a form of welfare for his family, friends and supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson