It is hard NOT to be condescending to someone so devoid of strategic thought.
I don’t take my cues from anybody - I heard about it, then listened to Bundy say what he had to say, did not listen to anybody else before forming my opinion that he made a grave strategic error. I don’t care what he was talking about, I don’t care if it was PC or not, all I care about is that it derailed Bundy’s cause, and his cause was on the way to doing serious damage to the BLM, the feds and Harry and the kid.
I suppose, in your pursuit of speaking the truth, if you were introduced to your pastor’s (or boss’s, or important customer’s) heavyset wife you would feel obliged to spout, “Gee, you’re fat!” wouldn’t you? Well, it would be true, so you would be right! And instead of walking on eggshells you will speak the truth...and be set free! Right? No, it would be a strategic mistake - just like Bundy’s statement was.
The only thing that should matter for Bundy is if he helps his cause. He didn’t, he hurt it. And the damage was predictable. So you tell me, is doing something that predictably hurts your legitimate interests a smart thing, a good thing, the right thing?
I’m hurting his cause? Hardly!! I only dream my words have so much impact - but if I could speak to Cliven, I would say the same thing to try and help him regain his focus. I’m speaking here in what I fear is a futile attempt to get the discussion back on track - but idiots like you want to keep it off topic in order to prove what? That you have no idea how to win a debate?
You are so ignorant of what is actually happening that you expend your energy defending the correctness of what he said (when I have never said he was wrong in what he said, only in saying it) - which is EXACTLY what Harry and the Whores want you to do. What they don’t want is for us to ignore what he said, and stay focused on grazing rights and BLM and Harry’s felonious pocket-lining and federal force and intimidation of citizens. So you go right ahead and do exactly what Harry Reid is hoping you will do. I will condescendingly pat you on the head, and talk to folks who have a clue.
So you say ... your actions prove otherwise.
all I care about is that it derailed Bundy’s cause
"It" did nothing. A militant homosexual communist at the New York Times tried to derail Mr. Bundy. You're helping the queers in Big Media. Shame on you.
I’m speaking here in what I fear is a futile attempt to get the discussion back on track
Horsecrap! Again. If you were serious, you'd be talking about BLM overreach, Jackbooted thugs, screwed up land rights, and Harry Reid's corruption.
But you're not. You're on several threads, ranting against Mr. Bundy.
Very eloquent and I agree with you. Shame Bundy didn’t have someone there to warn him about what the media would try to do to help the Reid cause.
I still don’t know what was asked Bundy in order to get his opinion on race. Had nothing at all to do with his cause.