Posted on 04/25/2014 1:39:27 PM PDT by upchuck
She is "puzzled" and found it "odd" that Snowden fled the country.
Speaking at the University of Connecticut on Wednesday night, Hillary Clinton made a restrained but nonetheless damning attack against Edward Snowden.
At the event, an interviewer asked Clinton whether she thought the former National Security Agency contractor's disclosures about its domestic spying programs had any positive effects on American security policy or public discourse.
Without ever explicitly mentioning the NSA's spying programs, Clinton justified their utility in protecting the U.S. from another terrorist attack in the wake of 9/11.
"People were desperate to avoid another attack, and I saw enough intelligence as a senator from New York, and then certainly as secretary [of State], that this is a constant—there are people right this minute trying to figure out how to do harm to Americans and to other innocent people," Clinton said. "So it was a debate that needs to happen, so that we make sure that we're not infringing on Americans' privacy, which is a valued, cherished personal belief that we have. But we also had to figure out how to get the right amount of security."
As for Snowden's role in exposing the NSA programs, Clinton insinuated that she found his motives suspicious.
"When he emerged and when he absconded with all that material, I was puzzled because we have all these protections for whistle-blowers. If he were concerned and wanted to be part of the American debate, he could have been," she said. "But it struck me as—I just have to be honest with you—as sort of odd that he would flee to China, because Hong Kong is controlled by China, and that he would then go to Russia—two countries with which we have very difficult cyberrelationships, to put it mildly."
Let's take a moment to parse Clinton's language here. She didn't call Snowden a traitor, or plainly say that him leaving the country made her suspicious. In American politics, it's never good to come right out and accuse someone of wrongdoing—you can just say you're "confused" or "puzzled" by their actions. In the same way, "odd" or "strange" often serve as semantic placeholders for "bad." Just ask Rep. Paul Ryan, who abruptly ended a television interview in 2012 after an unwelcome remark about tax cuts, then told his interviewer, "That was kind of strange. You trying to stuff words in people's mouths?"
Clinton stressed the strangeness of Snowden's decision to flee to countries that have perpetrated cyberattacks against the U.S. She noted that when State Department officials would travel to Russia or China on diplomatic business, they would leave their cell phones aboard the plane with their batteries taken out. "It's not like the only government in the world doing anything is the United States," she said.
"I think turning over a lot of that material—intentionally or unintentionally—drained, gave all kinds of information, not only to big countries, but to networks and terrorist groups and the like. So I have a hard time thinking that somebody who is a champion of privacy and liberty has taken refuge in Russia, under Putin's authority."
With sarcasm creeping into her voice, Clinton implied that Snowden acted all too friendly toward Vladimir Putin, whose country has been harboring Snowden since last August.
"And then he calls in to a Putin talk show and says, 'President Putin, do you spy on people?' And President Putin says, 'Well, from one intelligence professional to another, of course not.' 'Oh, thank you so much!' I mean really. I don't know, I have a hard time following it."
It will be interesting to contrast Clinton's remarks with Sen. Rand Paul's when he speaks at Harvard University on Friday afternoon. In all likelihood, he'll rehash the same jokes he made when he spoke at Berkeley in March about the NSA listening in on his cell-phone conversations. Meanwhile, Bill Clinton has called Snowden an "imperfect messenger" for bringing the debate about privacy versus national security to the fore.
Both Hillary Clinton and Paul are trying to win over college students to their philosophy. If applause decibels are any indication, though, students favor lionizing the whistle-blower over shaming him.
Hillary found it “odd” that Snowden fled the country after he revealed to everyone that our government is deeply involved on surveilling its own citizens more than it is terrorists? She says that after Benghazi, Breibart, Fuddy and all of 0’s alleged former gay lovers end up dead (among so many others). Is she stupid?...lol
Well hell yeah, he left before they could dart him, run his car into a traffic pole, or put a bullet in his head with a suicide note next to him. Its what you call being “smart”.
Maybe he got a message to meet at Ft Marcy Park.
Whitewatergate
FBI Filegate
Rose LawFirmgate
Travelgate
Fostergate
These are just those I remember. A great book I read when these goons polluted the oval office, “Unlimited Access”. Great read.
Think the FBI fella’s name that wrote it was Gary Aldrech...something like that. 30yr FBI man resigned from White House detail because he couldn’t stand the corruption and desecration in and of the office.
Crooks...the whole lot of’em.
Benghazigate
I am “puzzled” by and find it “odd” that incompetent degenerates like this dried-up, dishonest, ethically-challenged, self-centered, alcoholic criminal can be wealthy and can be given any position of responsibility or authority. This subhuman scum should just fade away. She is tiresome. Preferably, she will go to prison for here numerous crimes. What a waste of space and air. Her family are all commie creeps.
No argument here, it looks like you have it covered.
You did, too, Hillary. Your help got 4 Americans dead.
What's that got to do with anything. Surely you are capable of understanding that it's a whole different set of rules when a Secretary of State or a President aids and abets the terrorists......
Let me help you with a key point: Snowden also helped the American People by letting us know that more of what we suspected is true - the government does "have it in for us" and is breaking all sorts of Constitutional laws and restraints.....
Hope that cleared up the difference.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.