Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Let’s get one thing straight — INCREASED SPENDING UNDER REAGAN IS NOT ENTIRELY HIS FAULT.

His investments in national security ended the Cold War and made possible the subsequent defense spending reductions that are largely responsible for the subsequent federal surpluses ( To which the Gingrich congress gets greater credit than Clinton himself, who had to be dragged kicking and screaming to agree to the budget ).

His efforts to restrain the expansion of federal government helped to limit the growth of domestic spending despite the efforts of the Tip O’Neil congress to INCREASE IT.

If Reagan’s critics had been willing to work with him to limit domestic spending even further and to control the growth of entitlements, the budget would have been balanced five to ten years sooner and without the massive tax increase imposed in 1993.


5 posted on 04/25/2014 7:10:51 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Actually none of the spending increases were his fault. The military/national defense portion of the budget, or when measured as a % of GNP, scarcely moved in the 1980s. What grew were “Payments to individuals,” by about 15%. Straight from the government’s own budget books.


24 posted on 04/25/2014 8:28:40 AM PDT by LS ('Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually.' Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The left, and libertarians, are purist. They always point to his deficits. By today’s standards they were nothing.

His last three fiscal years the deficits were around $150B a year. Today they are over $1 Trillion a year.


39 posted on 04/25/2014 11:50:32 AM PDT by Fledermaus (Conseravtives are all that's left to defend the Constitution. Dems hate it, and Repubs don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

You are absolutely correct. To get his military spending (and intelligence, which Carter decimated), Reagan compromised with O’Neal agreed to allow automatic entitlement escalators.

In his second term, however, military spending DECREASED. Reagan won the Cold War, launched an economic boom that lasted through the Clinton administration , and rebuilt our military. Now Bush an Obama have unwound it all. The Shining City on a Hill is now sliding into oblivion.


41 posted on 04/25/2014 2:59:38 PM PDT by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I do not think the issue is how much Reagan spent but how much he accomplished. We had an economic recovery under Reagan, The Berlin Wall came down, and too many other things to name.

I can’t think of a thing Carter accomplished, he even failed at getting the hostages out....so no accomplishment should equal no expense.


43 posted on 04/25/2014 4:46:33 PM PDT by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson