[IYAS9YAS]

Are you implying I should read the article?

Well, it wouldn't be a bad idea, but also wouldn't help regarding the permit, as it was silent on it. But the permit is shown in the video, I went back and viewed it again. He's got a good case of adverse possession going here. He's been assessed on the improvements to "his" property, has paid taxes on it, and has maintained/improved it for more than 15 years (the garage is over 15 years old).

[IYAS9YAS]

Okay, so I was wrong. The article implied a permit was taken out by stating "He says if the building permit shows that Wesley built the garage in 1998, that would be in excess of 15 years." It didn't actually state a permit was taken out, though. The permit was shown in the video portion.

Going to my time-out corner now.

[driftdiver]

Read the article? I didn’t know anyone did that around here.

:)