Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mdittmar

Another version of “vote for us because we aren’t as bad as the other party.” They don’t understand people are yearning to vote FOR candidates who are true believers in the Constitution and individual liberty. There is very little satisfaction in always having to vote against what you perceive is the greater evil.

Harry Reid isn’t on the ballot in my state and I’m far from convinced the GOP establishment candidate will be any better than the Democrat holding the contested Senate seat in my state. It may be another year of holding my nose to vote for the RINO and hoping for the best while knowing I’ll be disappointed.


7 posted on 04/23/2014 7:46:14 PM PDT by Soul of the South (Yesterday is gone. Today will be what we make of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Soul of the South
There is very little satisfaction in always having to vote against what you perceive is the greater evil.

That's because there's no column in the results for "votes against". Only votes for.

Ted Cruz has had it right from the beginning. If you vote for something, that means you support it. Votes mean things just like words do. Voting for the 'lesser of two evils' simply means you support a lesser evil.

10 posted on 04/23/2014 7:51:40 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg ("Compromise" means you've already decided you lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson