Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conservaKate

I wasn’t addressing that.
It’s legitimate to discuss his ACTUAL STATEMENTS.

However, most of this thread is people addressing something he did not say. I find that very dishonest.

If he were President he would not be able to unilaterally change the law. So factually he is correct, the law is not going to be changed directly by him (or anyone else) who might be elected President. The fact that he is so pro-Life however means he could use the office to promote his views and use persuasion to change the public’s opinions on abortion ... something he mentioned over and over in the video.


78 posted on 04/23/2014 8:55:41 PM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: Lorianne

I don’t disagree that some folks don’t always read/listen to all of an article before making a comment. BUT, I am not sure that waiting for someone to get into office to do the ‘right’ thing has worked out so well either.

Don’t remember the last R presidents doing much about this issue even when the R’s were in the majority in both sides of congress. Not pointing fingers...just wondering how long we can last on hope? ( pardon the phrase).

I just don’t think Rand is my guy...for many reasons. Rand is just a bit too too much a chip off of daddy for my taste. I haven’ t figured out who my ‘guy’ is....but there is a ways to go yet.


80 posted on 04/23/2014 9:14:28 PM PDT by conservaKate (R got it wrong in 2012. We must get it right in 2014 & 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson