To: svcw
If you were really pro-life, as you claim, you would know that Rand Paul introduced S. 583, the Life at Conception Act on March 14, 2013. This bill would extend the Constitutional protection of life to the unborn from the time of conception. He was also the original co-sponsor of the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act in the Senate (S. 946), which would cut off all federal funding for abortion. His voting pro-life voting record is 100% according to Right To Life; no Republican senator can match that. So which of your Republican candidates has done more for the cause of pro-life?
To: LambSlave
If I were really....good bye you freak.
Libertarians are not as a matter of plate form pro life.
He is just like his dad on this subject.
55 posted on
04/23/2014 6:53:32 PM PDT by
svcw
(Not 'hope and change' but 'dopes in chains')
To: LambSlave
His voting pro-life voting record is 100% according to Right To Life; no Republican senator can match that. Don't come here on a Rand Paul thread with your facts! People don't want to hear them! They'd much prefer politicians who pay lip-service to their single issues, making pledges and empty promises that they can't possibly keep in order to win their votes.
59 posted on
04/23/2014 6:58:57 PM PDT by
Drew68
To: LambSlave
“Rand Paul introduced S. 583, the Life at Conception Act on March 14, 2013”
So we now know that Rand Paul is an opportunist hypocrite, who never believed in the bill he sponsored. He was just trying to fool people.
103 posted on
04/24/2014 6:12:44 AM PDT by
NKP_Vet
("It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died;we should thank God that such men lived" ~ Patton)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson