To disagree with the dissents views on the costs and benefits of racial preferences is not to wish away, rather than confront racial inequality, Roberts wrote.
People can disagree in good faith on this issue, but it similarly does more harm than good to question the openness and candor of those on either side of the debate.
BTW a leftist cannot afford to ascribe good faith to those with whom they disagree. To do so would invite serious consideration of the opposition point of view.
And because leftist ideologies are rooted in fantasy raster than reality their arguments will always suffer by comparison.