My point was simply that BLM was not intruding into the state of Texas, one of the few if not only states with no BLM land. The argument is over where the boundary of TX is.
I don’t necessarily agree with the BLM.
BTW, what moron came up with a boundary that is inevitably going to move over time. I can understand it in the 19th century, but not today.
True BLM doesn’t own any land in Texas but they do manage some Federal owned land.
In any case it seems some 90,000 acres will be removed from the state of Texas with
ownership being transferred somewhere else. Or am I reading this process the wrong way?