Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Charles Martel; yldstrk
Lousenberg's legislation is also unconstitutional on its face. It (and this state "law") clearly violate both due process and non-infringement of the right to keep and bear arms. It is an infringement of rights and a deprivation of property purely on someone's say-so, with no opportunity for even a rebuttal much less a trial.

It's evil, it's totalitarian, and it's very un-American.

32 posted on 04/23/2014 7:29:56 AM PDT by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: NorthMountain

Yep, and then there’s the issue of these laws being applied retroactively against people who had restraining orders issued against them long before Frank Lautenberg even dreamed this up. The intentional blurring of the differences between misdemeanors and felonies is abhorrent as well. The only places you see that are where the federal government is interested in exerting power - war on drugs, anti-gun initiatives, etc.


35 posted on 04/23/2014 7:45:48 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson