[MasterGunner01]

I think you've hit on it. Women have an aversion to getting their hands dirty and doing critical abstract thinking and analysis of mechanical things. They'd much rather do the fluff courses in college — the social ‘sciences’ and other things not requiring analytic and practical skills.

I have found this breed of ‘college educated’ females to be unappreciative, dull, self-centered, and boring. They've worked for years to reduce K-12 males into subsurvient, harmless drones — girly men or metrosexuals — and then constantly complain they can't find ‘real’ men. Sorry ladies, you're just getting back the crop of eunuchs you've cultivated.

Why is a woman like Sarah Palin such a threat to women of this ilk? Because Palin is bright, hasn't gone to prestegious Ivy League schools, is no stranger to hard work and getting her hands dirty, appreciates men who do real work (and educational resume is no disqualifier), don't pose as pseudo intellectual phonies, and raises her kids in a hetrosexual family with a mother and a father.

[verga]

I teach in Rural Virginia. About 2-4% of our female population are “Princesses.” The rest have no trouble getting their hands dirty. It all depends on how they are raised up.