Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoConPubbie

You’re wrong on how Reagan led his campaigns. Sorry you just are.

I also somewhat resent your false equivalency. If we are not free, as living beings outside the womb, please tell me who will be able to stand for life inside the womb.

Serious question. You should give it some thought.

But your’re still wrong about Reagan’s campaign. Rolling back the evils of our own government, and of the Soviet Empire, were priorities one and two.


74 posted on 04/22/2014 7:59:02 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: C. Edmund Wright
You’re wrong on how Reagan led his campaigns. Sorry you just are.

No, I am not.

I was there.

He was the first POTUS candidate to elevate his Pro-Life position to an equal level with all of his other positions.

Revisionist history, or maybe what you want it to be, but certainly not the truth.
77 posted on 04/22/2014 8:01:28 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: C. Edmund Wright; SoConPubbie

You’ve got to remember, CEW, that Reagan big-time courted the Moral Majority of Jerry Falwell. It was a linch pin in his coalition. It brought in a huge number of blue-collar democrats for him.

Prior to Reagan, it was (and I hesitate to admit this) Jimmy Carter who accidentally won the moral vote with his “evangelical outreach” one memorable point of which was the “lust in the heart” statement in the Playboy interview (of all places.)

The morals voter wasn’t so pronounced post WWII until then...not until the drug/sex rebellion of the late 60’s.


79 posted on 04/22/2014 8:03:40 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: C. Edmund Wright
If we are not free, as living beings outside the womb, please tell me who will be able to stand for life inside the womb.

Sorry, God's laws are not meant to be put through the shredder of moral jeopardy.

Though I detest the familiarity of the phrase, you have to ask yourself, "What would Jesus do?".

Do you consider yourself a Christian?

Are his laws, commands, and directions the most important thing in your life?

Do you put your obedience to God over your political strategy and principles?

If you do, you cannot succumb to the lure of pragmatism mixed with strategy if it in anyway diminishes your allegiance to God.

If you are in anyway lowering the Social Issues below any other of our freedoms and responsibilities as Christians, you are denying Christ.
80 posted on 04/22/2014 8:05:37 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson