Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Walt Griffith

Certainly the argument could be made that money made on ethanol actually subsidizes animal feed.

A rough rule is that a given weight of corn will produce one-third ethanol, one-third high protein animal feed, and one-third CO2.


3 posted on 04/21/2014 6:52:43 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jjotto

I think the most important feature of ethanol is that at any time in the case of severe food shortage we could stop making it and we’d have a lot of surplus corn. Ethanol gives us a food buffer in case of war or famine.


5 posted on 04/21/2014 7:35:33 PM PDT by Hardslab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: jjotto
A rough rule is that a given weight of corn will produce one-third ethanol, one-third high protein animal feed, and one-third CO2.

In all of the arguments to date that I've seen against ethanol, every one throws out the 1/3 high protein animal feed.

Instead, for purposes of advancing their sides argument, they assume that 1/3 to simply be landfill material, and of no value to anyone.

In actual large scale animal experiments done by universities, that 1/3 is sometimes as high as 1/2.

9 posted on 04/21/2014 8:16:27 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Want to keep your doctor? Remove your Democrat Senator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson