I wonder if this is a test case being set up so that the BSA can blame the courts for having to allow gay leadership.
It seems to me that restricting membership based on shared values and belief in God is a lot easier than restricting just leadership positions.
But then again, when it comes to labor law, Christian organizations are more successful at restricting policy making leadership, rather than requiring janitorial staff to have shared values.
I am thinking the opposite; that the gay agenda leadership is now aiming to get entry into scout leadership.