You clearly have to be on the slippery slope to legalized meth and heroin if you think enforcement is useless. Why stop at pot? As a liberaltarian I’m sure you’re for all drugs being legal, but it’s hypocrisy to say only pot should be changed and not the rest. And frankly when it comes to mental changes and psychological addiction pot is just as bad or worse than the others.
We know Soros has supported and funded heroin and pot legalization since 1996. We know Soros has spent millions of dollars campaigning against the "war on drugs", Bush, and supporting Obama. We know that since Obama was installed heroin production in Afghanistan has hit record numbers. Opiate related accidents America have now become the primary cause of accidental deaths. (Not alcohol) We know Wall Street banks are openly laundering cartel drug money with impunity. We can assume the same is true for Soros' hedge funds. We know the Holder's DEA was for some strange reason meeting with and providing Mexican cartel's with an "arsenal" of weapons. We know heroin destroyed China, and in 2014 American cities have an abundance of highly addictive, heroin readily available and as cheap as a pack of cigarettes. Sadly the Godless, fatherless, or otherwise vulnerable children, don't stand a chance.
“You clearly have to be on the slippery slope to legalized meth and heroin “
Same thing was said of alcohol. Do you desire to ban alcohol? How about “trans fats”, sugars, or anything else someone in government says you should not eat or possess? We’ve seen Moosechelle already say we need to ban things. Hell, New York City banned 32oz drinks!
The real slippery slope has been that once the government finds it can get away with banning things then it bans everything.